Words and Wizards

I’ll be damned. Bill Safire has noticed the terms blog and props in the same column (note: this is Safire’s On Language column in the magazine, not his editorial column). Speaking of newspapers, an outfit called ProQuest has digitized the entire New York Times archive, from 1851-1999. That’s four terabytes of info, folks. There’s a …

Continue reading ‘Words and Wizards’ »

Who needs a boss like this?

Why I deplore George W. Bush, Part whatever: because he continues to bash and belabor civilian employees of the government he’s supposed to be leading. As previously noted, he would dearly love to eliminate civil service protection from all those folks about to get merged into the Department of Homeland Security, but that’s not the …

Continue reading ‘Who needs a boss like this?’ »

To cut or not to cut

Here’s a tricky question: should scientific journals and their publishers self-censor articles which might reveal information potentially useful to terrorists? There’s precedent: back in the ’30s and ’40s there was an embargo on articles having to do with uranium in 237 different journals. On the lighter side, herein find a few humorous squibs from the …

Continue reading ‘To cut or not to cut’ »

Cats

1. Koko and Yum Yum–Lillian Jackson Braun’s “The Cat Who…” series 2. Pyewacket–van Druton, “Bell, Book and Candle” 3. Mehitabel–Don Marquis, “Archie and Mehitabel” 4. Hot Dog–Dennis the Menace’s Cat 5. Macavity–T.S. Eliot’s “Old Possum’s Book of Practical Cats”. Master criminal. 6. Graymalkin–Macbeth. Shakespeare makes the Witch in Macbeth say, “I come, Graymalkin,” Malkin being …

Continue reading ‘Cats’ »

Goosesteps, anyone?

Just when I thought this Administration had exhausted its attempts to destroy civil liberties, at least through September or so, Fascism, here we come. Ridge seems to think the posse comitatus law forbidding US military personnel from enforcement of civil laws “should be discussed.” General Eberhart’s comments, cited in that transcript, can be found here. …

Continue reading ‘Goosesteps, anyone?’ »